Strengthen the content and the enforcement of published performance standards.

Continue to write and foster the publication of performance standards for sub-discipline examinations.

Publish and maintain the Daubert Factors for Attorneys and Daubert Factors for Forensic Document Examiners presentations (as they relate to forensic document examination).

Participate in and support a Human Factors Working Group for Forensic Document Examination.

Expand the participant pool to include academicians, statisticians, legal professionals, and practitioners from other forensic disciplines.

SWGDOC operates using sub-groups, called committees, with a population of generally five to seven individuals in each. These committees draft new, or update existing, operating procedures for specific sub-disciplines within the forensic document field.  Once a committee completes a draft document it is vetted by the entire SWGDOC membership.  After a draft is approved by the SWGDOC members it is made public for any and all persons to view and comment.  After a draft has been vetted by the public it becomes a published SWGDOC standard. Before separating itself from ASTM, SWGDOC wrote and/or updated twenty standards published through that organization.

The field of Forensic Document Examination was one of the first to receive repeated challenges in court.  As a result, our discipline was motivated to begin writing and publishing sub-discipline specific operating procedures for use during forensic document examinations.

Forensic document examination does not involve the employment or practice of the study of handwriting in an attempt to create a personality profile or otherwise analyze or judge a writer's personality or character.   Furthermore, the practice of personality profiling or character assessment based on handwriting is not a foundation for the practice of forensic document examination in whole or in part.

Experience in the following does not constitute expertise or training in whole or part in forensic document examination: calligraphy, penmanship, fraud investigation, law enforcement, loss prevention, banking, general criminalistics or other forensic disciplines, legal training, or laboratory management.

For more than 20 years, several federal agencies have supported the efforts of various scientific working groups, often referred to as SWGs, for the advancement of forensic standards and techniques.

Today there are over 20 SWGs in existence representing forensic disciplines including DNA, Firearms, Latent Prints, et al.

The Scientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination (SWGDOC) develops standards and guidelines for the field of forensic document examination.  SWGDOC is composed of private examiners and government examiners from local, state, and federal laboratories throughout the United States.  SWGDOC began in 1997 as TWGDOC (Technical Working Group for Questioned Documents), was renamed SWGDOC in 1999, and was reorganized in 2001.  From 2000 to 2012 SWGDOC published their standards through American Society for Testing and Materials International (now simply ASTM International).  In 2012 SWGDOC stopped publishing their standards through ASTM and began self-publishing their standards as is the practice for nearly every other SWG group.

The forensic document examiner conducts scientific examinations, comparisons, and analyses of documents in order to: (1) establish genuineness or nongenuineness, or to reveal alterations, additions, or deletions, (2) identify or eliminate persons as the source of handwriting, (3) identify or eliminate the source of machine produced documents, typewriting, or other impression marks, or relative evidence, and (4) preserve and/or restore legibility.  They also write technical reports and give expert testimony.

  • You are here:  
  • Home
  • Uncategorised